Remember the Objectively Pro-Rape Caucus of the GOP? Hint: no female republicans joined the club.
Can’t remember?
The objectively Pro-Rape Caucus is made up of 30 infamous male GOP senators who voted against allowing rape victims who are employees of Iraqi reconstruction contractors from seeking justice in American courts.
The Al Franken sponsored measure passed 68-30 with 30 Republican men objecting but all republican women (and some men) siding with the majority. It sounded like to stupid move at the time. Surely nobody is objectively pro-rape, are they?
At the time, I suspected something else was at play. And sure enough there was:
Beneath the personal story and the partisan recriminations is a long-simmering dispute between trial lawyers and the business lobby, with trial lawyers arguing that mandatory arbitration clauses stack the decks against employees, and business groups arguing that arbitration is the fairest, most expeditious and least expensive way to deal with complaints and that mandatory arbitration evens the playing field.
OK the infamous 30 men have an excuse. They were defending the defense contractors. But the problem is that the infamous 30 were favoring the interests of powerful large corporations over the interests of an American women who may have been drugged, held captive in a box and repeatedly raped in
Now this Caucus of Senators are having second thoughts about their vote.
Republican senators feel burned by Al Franken — and not by his old jokes.
The Republicans are steamed at Franken because partisans on the left are using a measure he sponsored to paint them as rapist sympathizers — and because Franken isn’t doing much to stop them.
[…]
some of his new Republican colleagues argue that the amendment is being grossly mischaracterized — and has spawned attacks like the satirical website RepublicansforRape.org — and now question whether Franken is doing a good job of separating his past from his current line of work.
“I don’t know what his motivation was for taking us on, but I would hope that we won’t see a lot of Daily Kos-inspired amendments in the future coming from him,” said South Dakota Sen. John Thune, No. 4 in the Senate Republican leadership.
Why does a sack of hammers come to mind when you run across John Thune's name?
Anyway word on the street is that nervous republican senators want Franken help them out and in the words of one source “make it clear that GOP senators don’t support assault or rape.” Among those concerned are Poor Lindsey Grahamnesty and his buddies Senator Bob “Corky” Corker and Senator Lamar who co-authored an Op-Ed explaining away their vote. (By the way both Lamar and Corky have identified by Red State Blog as possible Teabagging targets in the future. Could this vote be an attempt to earn favor with The Base?).
Says Grahamnesty:
“I think it would be helpful for Sen. Franken to come forward and say, ‘I’m not suggesting that anybody who votes for my amendment is indifferent to crimes against women or anybody else.’ What’s going on politically with the amendment Sen. Franken can’t control, but I think it would be helpful for him personally to just let the rest of us know that’s the views of others — not him.”
Apparently Grahamnesty wants Franken to vouch for his anti-rape credentials. OK maybe he will.
But why all the whining about how mean Franken is? He didn’t threaten to send the infamous 30 to
Poor Fellows, they’re the real victims here. They just can't catch a break. But at least none have been drugged, held captive in a box and repeatedly raped.
